Recherche
Recherche plein texte sur tous les incidents publiés. Les noms d'agents ne sont jamais indexés — les résultats portent sur le résumé caviardé, le nom du corps policier, la référence tribunalaire et les champs à vocabulaire contrôlé (type d'incident, constat, disposition).
firearm_discharge · 2026-Q1
A decision was made in the matter of a shooting involving the RCMP near Grande Prairie in early 2026.
firearm_discharge · 2025-Q4
A decision was made in the matter of a shooting incident involving the RCMP in Grande Prairie. The incident occurred in late 2025.
firearm_discharge · 2024-Q2
A decision was made in the matter of a police shooting involving the Edmonton Police Service in early 2024.
use_of_force · 2023-Q4
Decision of the acting executive director of the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team in the matter of a use of force by police officers in Calgary in late 2023 | released in late 2025
firearm_discharge · 2023-Q3
A decision was made in the matter of a police shooting in Calgary, in 2023.
firearm_discharge · 2019-Q1
A decision was made in the matter of a police shooting in Calgary in early 2019.
custody_death · 2024-Q2
Decision in the matter of a death of a newborn child following detention in RCMP cells in early 2024 | released in 2026
death · 2021-Q2
A decision was made in the matter of a death during an arrest by the RCMP in Lloydminster. The incident occurred in early 2021 and the decision was released in 2026.
firearm_discharge · 2024-Q2
Decision of the acting executive director of the Alberta Serious Incident Response Team in the matter of a shooting near a lake in Alberta in early 2024 | released in late 2025
custody_death · 2018-Q4
An individual died from fentanyl toxicity at a correctional institution in late 2018.
custody_death · 2018-Q4
A person died from acute toxic effects of fentanyl and cocaine while in custody at a detention centre. The coroner's inquest made recommendations to the Ministry of the Solicitor General and the detention centre to improve safety and prevent similar deaths.
custody_death · 2018-Q4
Inquest into the death of the affected person, who died at a hospital in a regional city, in late 2018.
custody_injury · 2006-Q2
Allegations of detainee abuse by Canadian Forces in Afghanistan, including injuries to three men detained by CF personnel. The Military Police Complaints Commission is requested to investigate the circumstances surrounding the detention and alleged abuse of the men.
custody_injury · 2006-Q2
Un détenu a été blessé pendant sa détention par les Forces canadiennes en Afghanistan. Les membres de la police militaire n’ont pas suivi la procédure habituelle pour faire examiner le détenu par un médecin.
police_misconduct · 2010-Q4
The MPCC's public interest investigation concerns an anonymous complaint alleging that in late 2010 and early 2011, a commanding officer at a military base in Afghanistan conducted exercises at a detainee facility to terrorize detainees, and that the military police subsequently failed to lay charges. The investigation focused on the conduct of the military police members involved in the investigation and their decision not to lay charges. Over 65 witnesses were interviewed and subject interviews were conducted in late 2018.
custody_injury · 2010-Q4
La Commission d’examen des plaintes concernant la police militaire (CPPM) a mené une enquête d’intérêt public concernant des allégations de mauvais traitement de détenus à l’étranger par la police militaire.
custody_injury · 2026-Q1
The material events in question are clear on the evidence collected by the SIU and may briefly be summarized. In the morning of early 2026, members of the Emergency Response Team convened at a house situated in an area of Cornwall. Acting under the authority of a CDSA search warrant, the team entered the house to search for cocaine and fentanyl. The affected person was present at the time and alerted to the officers’ presence outside the home. They entered the main floor bathroom and attempted to conceal themselves behind a sink. They were quickly located by an officer and placed on the floor in a prone position. The subject officer, the team leader, had forced their way into the bathroom and located the affected person. Having positioned the affected person on the floor, the officer dropped their left knee intending to lower themselves by their side but inadvertently landed on the affected person’s back. The impact fractured the affected person’s left hand, which was underneath their chest at the time. The affected person was taken into custody and transported to the police station. They were seen at hospital later in the day and diagnosed with their injury.
custody_transport_injury · 2026-Q1
The evidence collected by the SIU, including interviews with the affected person and police and non-police eyewitness, and video footage that captured the incident, gives rise to the following scenario. As was their legal right, the subject officers did not agree to an interview with the SIU or the release of their notes. In the morning of early 2026, the subject officer and the witness officer were dispatched to a convenience store in the area of a major intersection. A store employee had contacted police to report a male and female shoplifter. The officers arrived on scene and spoke with store staff, confirming that two suspects had left the store with alcohol and food without paying for the items. The employee showed a video clip they had taken with their cellphone, depicting the male and female. The subject officer and the witness officer located the suspects – the affected persons – at a nearby bus shelter. One of the affected persons was taken into custody by the witness officer without incident. The other affected person, however, resisted when the subject officer attempted to secure them in handcuffs. The officer was able to affix a cuff to one hand but had difficulty attaching the other cuff to the affected person’s other hand. The affected person objected to their arrest, denied that they had done anything wrong, and struggled against the subject officer’s efforts to bring their arms behind their back. The tussle eventually made its way outside the bus shelter where the witness officer intervened. The officers brought the affected person to the ground, after which the witness officer secured both their hands in handcuffs. Following their arrest, the affected person was taken to hospital and treated for a fractured wrist.
custody_injury · 2025-Q4
The material events in question are clear on the evidence collected by the SIU and may briefly be summarized. In late 2025, the subject officer and the witness officer were dispatched to an apartment in the area of a city, following calls to police from the resident, the affected person. The affected person threatened to kill herself if police did not attend her residence and indicated that she had cut her wrists. The officers arrived at the location, where they were joined by paramedics. The first responders made their way to the apartment door. Finding it locked, the subject officer kicked it open. The affected person was in her bedroom at the time. She was highly agitated and belligerent with the officers. A cut was visible on her wrist. The officers handcuffed the affected person behind the back and were escorting her down a hallway in the apartment when the witness officer briefly pinned her against a wall as the affected person’s hostility escalated. The affected person turned and spat on the witness officer, and was taken to the floor by the officers in a prone position. The affected person screamed at the officers to kill her and banged her face on the floor about a half-dozen times, fracturing her nose in the process. The subject officer took hold of the affected person’s head to prevent her hurting herself. The affected person was seen at hospital after her arrest and ultimately diagnosed with a broken nose.
pursuit_custody_injury · 2026-Q1
The evidence collected by the SIU, including interviews with the affected person and the subject officer, and video footage that captured the incident, gives rise to the following scenario. In early 2026, the affected person was arrested by the subject officer and another officer inside a residence. The officers had gone to the location following a call to police about an issue at the residence. The affected person was unlawfully inside the abandoned home. They had entered seeking shelter from the cold outside, and had started a fire to warm themselves. The affected person was searched by the subject officer at the scene and again at a police detachment. Some items were confiscated. Asked whether they had consumed illicit substances in the last 24 hours, the affected person said they had not. The affected person was lodged in a cell. Later, upon returning to their cell, the affected person retrieved a substance from a hidden location and consumed it. They began to suffer the effects of the substance and became unresponsive on the cell floor. The subject officer entered the cell within minutes of the affected person’s medical event and attempted to rouse them. They placed the affected person in the recovery position, administered doses of nasal naloxone and contacted emergency services. Paramedics arrived on scene and took charge of the affected person’s care. They were transported to hospital and treated for an overdose.